# Reviewing New Members

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/reviewing-new-members/228991>\
**Category:** Product Support\
**Created:** [June 4, 2022, 4:42am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/reviewing-new-members/228991 "2022-06-04T04:42:42Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jimkleiber](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/jimkleiber/32/121814_2.png) [@jimkleiber](https://meta.discourse.org/u/jimkleiber)\
**Post date:** [June 4, 2022, 7:03pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/reviewing-new-members/228991/4 "2022-06-04T19:03:21Z")

</div>

Yeah, the way I thought the change would work is making it so that one has to explicitly click approve on all users who joined through an anonymous invite link, not an invite that was tied directly to a specific email address. That those invites with specific email addresses would not override the must approve users. At least that’s how I interpreted the intent, I could be wrong on that and/or it could have been implemented differently. Maybe what I’m talking about are the edge cases that Sam mentioned not wanting to deal with.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/reviewing-new-members/228991)._