# \[RFC\] Native Data Provenance & Fact Mapping for Discourse

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/rfc-native-data-provenance-fact-mapping-for-discourse/392842
**Category:** Community Building
**Tags:** rfc
**Created:** [7 januari 2026 om 04:34 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/rfc-native-data-provenance-fact-mapping-for-discourse/392842 "2026-01-07T04:34:06Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Lief](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/lief/32/554366_2.png) [@Lief](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Lief)
#### Post date: [21 mei 2026 om 23:43 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/rfc-native-data-provenance-fact-mapping-for-discourse/392842/3 "2026-05-21T23:43:32Z")

</div>

I may still not fully grok what you are trying to build here. But the subject of “content provenance” is top of mind.

Curious if OP would take a look at this paper and share thoughts?

[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597825000172](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597825000172)

If you think this is too orthogonal a subject to your OP - I’ll move it up to a new post.  
Cheers.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/rfc-native-data-provenance-fact-mapping-for-discourse/392842)._