# S3 image bandwidth costs are getting annoying

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/s3-image-bandwidth-costs-are-getting-annoying/122052>\
**Category:** Self-hosting\
**Tags:** s3, hosting\
**Created:** [July 4, 2019, 1:45am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/s3-image-bandwidth-costs-are-getting-annoying/122052 "2019-07-04T01:45:59Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 31

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![spinitom](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/f19dbf/32.png) [@spinitom](https://meta.discourse.org/u/spinitom)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2022, 5:06pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/s3-image-bandwidth-costs-are-getting-annoying/122052/31 "2022-11-16T17:06:18Z")

</div>

Backblaze is cheaper than S3 for a very similar object store service. Idk if Discourse has a client for it.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/s3-image-bandwidth-costs-are-getting-annoying/122052)._