# I costi della larghezza di banda per le immagini S3 stanno diventando fastidiosi

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/s3-image-bandwidth-costs-are-getting-annoying/122052
**Category:** Self-hosting
**Tags:** s3, hosting
**Created:** [4 Luglio 2019, 1:45am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/s3-image-bandwidth-costs-are-getting-annoying/122052 "2019-07-04T01:45:59Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 32

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![pfaffman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/pfaffman/32/120154_2.png) [@pfaffman](https://meta.discourse.org/u/pfaffman)
#### Post date: [16 Novembre 2022, 8:09pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/s3-image-bandwidth-costs-are-getting-annoying/122052/32 "2022-11-16T20:09:35Z")

</div>

Se intendi backblaze B2, puoi vederlo qui: [Configure an S3 compatible object storage provider for uploads](https://meta.discourse.org/t/configure-an-s3-compatible-object-storage-provider-for-uploads/148916#backblaze-b2-cloud-storage-8)

> [@Falco](#):
>
> ### Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/s3-image-bandwidth-costs-are-getting-annoying/122052)._