# Safe for Work Mode - No Images

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/safe-for-work-mode-no-images/49965>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [2016 年 9 月 10 日午後 12:29 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/safe-for-work-mode-no-images/49965 "2016-09-10T12:29:01Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 13

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mittineague](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/mittineague/32/114259_2.png) [@Mittineague](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Mittineague)\
**Post date:** [2016 年 9 月 12 日午前 4:05 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/safe-for-work-mode-no-images/49965/13 "2016-09-12T04:05:07Z")

</div>

Thanks Sam. Seeing some examples gives the request some context I was incapable of imagining before.

I like the idea of using spoiler tags since having it “per post” is less of a “nuclear option”. But only if blurred is enough. eg.

```plaintext
[spoiler]
<img src="//cdck-file-uploads-global.s3.dualstack.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/meta/original/3X/4/d/4d01eca87294cf4ca00fed7124a93674e54169cc.png" width="336" height="210">
[/spoiler]

```

 ![](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/3X/4/d/4d01eca87294cf4ca00fed7124a93674e54169cc.png)

So perhaps a plugin that adds a way to toggle

```plaintext
div.topic-body img {
  display: none;
}

```

or something else would be better.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/safe-for-work-mode-no-images/49965)._