# Suche nach gemeinsamen Wörtern ergibt ein unerwartetes Ergebnis

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/searching-for-common-words-produces-unexpected-result/89920>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [14. Juni 2018 um 20:52 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/searching-for-common-words-produces-unexpected-result/89920 "2018-06-14T20:52:27Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tophee](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/tophee/32/73406_2.png) [@tophee](https://meta.discourse.org/u/tophee)\
**Post date:** [14. Juni 2018 um 21:43 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/searching-for-common-words-produces-unexpected-result/89920/5 "2018-06-14T21:43:50Z")

</div>

I suspected you would say that. But my point was that when you’re searching for the most relevant posts, there might be an (unjustified) bias towards older post.

In saying that, I’m assuming that likes (and possibly incoming links) are part of the formula for relevance search. Maybe that assumption is wrong?

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/searching-for-common-words-produces-unexpected-result/89920)._