# Formato de data curta em posts antigos: AAAA vs AA

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/short-date-format-on-old-posts-yyyy-vs-yy/295184
**Category:** UX
**Tags:** completed
**Created:** [13 Fevereiro , 2024 10:51 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/short-date-format-on-old-posts-yyyy-vs-yy/295184 "2024-02-13T10:51:48Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![JammyDodger](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/jammydodger/32/254611_2.png) [@JammyDodger](https://meta.discourse.org/u/JammyDodger)
#### Post date: [13 Fevereiro , 2024 11:18 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/short-date-format-on-old-posts-yyyy-vs-yy/295184/2 "2024-02-13T11:18:27Z")

</div>

Houve bastantes tópicos sobre isso ao longo dos anos, embora o consenso atual pareça ser que os sites ajustem isso como acharem melhor.

Leitura interessante, no entanto:

> [@Change to DD Mmm / Mmm 'YY for post dates](https://meta.discourse.org/t/change-to-dd-mmm-mmm-yy-for-post-dates/13625):
>
> Quick! Which of these two is older? [image] [image] Errr… Oh! The one with the apostrophe! Took you a second, didn’t it? I took an impromptu poll on IRC to confirm this: \<ii\> riking\_: it doesnt say if its feb 2013 or 13th of feb etc \<ii\> the '13 would suggest 2013 tho (after getting it wrong) \<culex\> I thought Feb didn'th ave the apostrophe \<Malqua\> no \<Malqua\> it was definitely jan ??, 13 I think that the date formats, even for English, should be changed to DD Mmm (so 13 Jan) and Mmm '…

> [@Displaying dates of posts - mixed formats make it hard to read](https://meta.discourse.org/t/displaying-dates-of-posts-mixed-formats-make-it-hard-to-read/32659):
>
> Hi, I would like to gather some feedback about how the date of a post is displayed. 2Here’s the thing: A post from the current year has its date displayed “Jun 12”. A post from past years has its date displayed as “Jun '12”. For those who haven’t spotted the difference, there’s an extra extra apostrophe in the second date - Jun '12. Maybe it’s just me, but it took me an insane amount of time to distinguish both. And when skimming through a list of posts on an instance where dates do matter…

> [@Year should be added to post date at some point](https://meta.discourse.org/t/year-should-be-added-to-post-date-at-some-point/12716):
>
> I can see why you wouldn’t think of this until [a year in](https://meta.discourse.org/t/one-year-of-discourse/12710), but now the problem is obvious. I just ran into a post from February 2013, but looking at the date I first thought “oh, this is super recent, how did I miss it?”

> [@Year format on abbreviated post dates not clear](https://meta.discourse.org/t/year-format-on-abbreviated-post-dates-not-clear/29198):
>
> The current date format used on posts is not clear at a glance. It can be difficult to determine if a post happened last month or last year. For example, the two posts below: Looking carefully, you can see that the first is from April 2014 and the second is from April 14. However, at a quick glance, this distinction is unclear. I believe that it would improve the UX if the year format were expanded to show the full year, instead of using the apostrophe format.

> [@Add full year to date to make them less visually confusing](https://meta.discourse.org/t/add-full-year-to-date-to-make-them-less-visually-confusing/86674):
>
> This might be just me, but I find that I’m often confused by the short date notation in posts: the notation of a year (Mar '15) is visually really close to the notation of a date (Mar 15). I tend to overlook the apostrophe and assume that a post is one or more years old, making me less interested in it. My suggestion is to change the years to a full year (Mar 2017) - making it impossible to confuse the two.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/short-date-format-on-old-posts-yyyy-vs-yy/295184)._
