# Should attaching an image be more obvious?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-attaching-an-image-be-more-obvious/31315>\
**Category:** UX\
**Created:** [Juillet 22, 2015, 10:50 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-attaching-an-image-be-more-obvious/31315 "2015-07-22T22:50:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 16

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cpradio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/cpradio/32/4970_2.png) [@cpradio](https://meta.discourse.org/u/cpradio)\
**Post date:** [Juillet 24, 2015, 2:45 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-attaching-an-image-be-more-obvious/31315/16 "2015-07-24T02:45:45Z")

</div>

> [@jesselperry](#):
>
> If there were some easy way to override the “upload” icon to always be the picture icon through CSS, I would do that immediately on mine. Do you know of a way?

```plaintext
.wmd-image-button::before {
   content: "";
}

```

Replace “” with the font-awesome icon you wish to use.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-attaching-an-image-be-more-obvious/31315)._