# Should attaching an image be more obvious?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-attaching-an-image-be-more-obvious/31315>\
**Category:** UX\
**Created:** [22 Julio, 2015 22:50 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-attaching-an-image-be-more-obvious/31315 "2015-07-22T22:50:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 19

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mittineague](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/mittineague/32/114259_2.png) [@Mittineague](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Mittineague)\
**Post date:** [24 Julio, 2015 04:33 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-attaching-an-image-be-more-obvious/31315/19 "2015-07-24T04:33:41Z")

</div>

> [@jesselperry](#):
>
> Unfortunately doesn’t work

Did you do backslash unicode inside quotes? eg.  
`content: "\2620";`  
for “skull and crossbones”

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-attaching-an-image-be-more-obvious/31315)._