# Should attaching an image be more obvious?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-attaching-an-image-be-more-obvious/31315>\
**Category:** UX\
**Created:** [2015年七月22日 22:50 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-attaching-an-image-be-more-obvious/31315 "2015-07-22T22:50:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 40

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![codinghorror](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/codinghorror/32/110067_2.png) [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)\
**Post date:** [2015年八月7日 07:55 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-attaching-an-image-be-more-obvious/31315/40 "2015-08-07T07:55:14Z")

</div>

Another option is to hide all the editing options altogether, ala what Kinja does now…

 ![](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/3X/a/4/a439bcc9bb6c9877414aa92776bcc4b23c697061.gif) 

Or, have just a few “major” toolbar elements then click to expand them all. Gmail basically does that.

 ![](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/3X/2/c/2c62dec7da2646d4d5caaa72956dac6767536a40.gif)

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-attaching-an-image-be-more-obvious/31315)._