# Should attaching an image be more obvious?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-attaching-an-image-be-more-obvious/31315>\
**Category:** UX\
**Created:** [22 Julio, 2015 22:50 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-attaching-an-image-be-more-obvious/31315 "2015-07-22T22:50:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 47

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Falco](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/falco/32/179432_2.png) [@Falco](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Falco)\
**Post date:** [11 Agosto, 2016 04:50 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-attaching-an-image-be-more-obvious/31315/47 "2016-08-11T04:50:02Z")

</div>

> [@joecures](#):
>
> I was more so referring to the ability to have a “simplified” composer that obfuscates the editing options (specifically for a mobile user)

The toolbar is already hidden by default on mobile.

 ![](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/3X/0/4/045b6ecb5af3647f5e97e28c97908862d9e13392.png)

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-attaching-an-image-be-more-obvious/31315)._