# Should I disclose the numbers one should reach to get granted the highest trust level?

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-i-disclose-the-numbers-one-should-reach-to-get-granted-the-highest-trust-level/75686
**Category:** Community Building
**Created:** [08.Декабрь.2017 14:34:30 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-i-disclose-the-numbers-one-should-reach-to-get-granted-the-highest-trust-level/75686 "2017-12-08T14:34:30Z")
**Posts on this page:** 9
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![meglio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/meglio/32/71444_2.png) [@meglio](https://meta.discourse.org/u/meglio)
#### Post date: [08.Декабрь.2017 14:34:30 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-i-disclose-the-numbers-one-should-reach-to-get-granted-the-highest-trust-level/75686/1 "2017-12-08T14:34:30Z")

</div>

People in our community sometimes think that the levels are not automatic, and there’s some bias in how levels are granted.

Is it a good idea to disclose the current settings for trust levels, so that users know what exactly they should do to reach some particular level?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![pfaffman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/pfaffman/32/120154_2.png) [@pfaffman](https://meta.discourse.org/u/pfaffman)
#### Post date: [08.Декабрь.2017 14:51:18 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-i-disclose-the-numbers-one-should-reach-to-get-granted-the-highest-trust-level/75686/2 "2017-12-08T14:51:18Z")

</div>

I don’t see a problem. Most sites use the default values, so you’d not be revealing any secrets.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![JagWaugh](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/jagwaugh/32/69335_2.png) [@JagWaugh](https://meta.discourse.org/u/JagWaugh)
#### Post date: [08.Декабрь.2017 15:04:55 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-i-disclose-the-numbers-one-should-reach-to-get-granted-the-highest-trust-level/75686/3 "2017-12-08T15:04:55Z")

</div>

It’s probably easier to just reveal the settings, than to answer individual questions, or try to convince them that you’re not running some privately chosen starchamber.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Johani](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/johani/32/176920_2.png) [@Johani](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Johani)
#### Post date: [08.Декабрь.2017 15:22:22 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-i-disclose-the-numbers-one-should-reach-to-get-granted-the-highest-trust-level/75686/4 "2017-12-08T15:22:22Z")

</div>

It’s easier to work towards a goal if you know what it is.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Mittineague](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/mittineague/32/114259_2.png) [@Mittineague](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Mittineague)
#### Post date: [08.Декабрь.2017 16:45:25 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-i-disclose-the-numbers-one-should-reach-to-get-granted-the-highest-trust-level/75686/5 "2017-12-08T16:45:25Z")

</div>

One potential snag might be if you have any members that have their trust level locked. It could be awkward explaining to a member why even though they have met all the requirements they haven’t advanced.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![pfaffman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/pfaffman/32/120154_2.png) [@pfaffman](https://meta.discourse.org/u/pfaffman)
#### Post date: [08.Декабрь.2017 16:53:44 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-i-disclose-the-numbers-one-should-reach-to-get-granted-the-highest-trust-level/75686/6 "2017-12-08T16:53:44Z")

</div>

Well, in that case there **would** be some bias in how trust levels were awarded. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![tobiaseigen](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/tobiaseigen/32/539204_2.png) [@tobiaseigen](https://meta.discourse.org/u/tobiaseigen)
#### Post date: [08.Декабрь.2017 18:00:55 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-i-disclose-the-numbers-one-should-reach-to-get-granted-the-highest-trust-level/75686/7 "2017-12-08T18:00:55Z")

</div>

It is a perhaps Little Known Fact™ that groups can be used to inadvertently lock the trust level when a user joins the group.

Personally I downplay the importance of trust levels.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![codinghorror](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/codinghorror/32/110067_2.png) [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)
#### Post date: [08.Декабрь.2017 22:20:32 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-i-disclose-the-numbers-one-should-reach-to-get-granted-the-highest-trust-level/75686/8 "2017-12-08T22:20:32Z")

</div>

I believe that bug was fixed @sam @eviltrout? I remember some discussion about it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![eviltrout](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/eviltrout/32/5275_2.png) [@eviltrout](https://meta.discourse.org/u/eviltrout)
#### Post date: [08.Декабрь.2017 22:40:45 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-i-disclose-the-numbers-one-should-reach-to-get-granted-the-highest-trust-level/75686/9 "2017-12-08T22:40:45Z")

</div>

Yes this has been changed (although not for old records, because they were locked previously.)

We now track “locked in group” separately from “locked manually”. When you leave the group you are put back to what your trust level would have been.
