# Should it be more obvious that tags are tags?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-it-be-more-obvious-that-tags-are-tags/110759>\
**Category:** UX\
**Created:** [3월 5, 2019, 4:59오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-it-be-more-obvious-that-tags-are-tags/110759 "2019-03-05T16:59:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![codinghorror](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/codinghorror/32/110067_2.png) [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)\
**Post date:** [3월 5, 2019, 5:19오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-it-be-more-obvious-that-tags-are-tags/110759/3 "2019-03-05T17:19:51Z")

</div>

The problem is that @sam, wrongly IMO, insisted that there be dividers between every single section.

- Tags and categories are strongly related and should be visually grouped together.

- Users and groups are strongly related and should be visually grouped together.

As for the concern in the first post, I do not feel it is warranted at all.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-it-be-more-obvious-that-tags-are-tags/110759)._
