# 为什么“未读”数量不在我打开未读内容之前消失？

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-not-unread-count-not-disappear-until-i-open-the-unread-things/34236>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [2015 年10 月 7 日 18:51 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-not-unread-count-not-disappear-until-i-open-the-unread-things/34236 "2015-10-07T18:51:27Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

作者： ![sam](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/sam/32/102149_2.png) [@sam](https://meta.discourse.org/u/sam)\
发布日期： [2015 年10 月 8 日 08:01 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-not-unread-count-not-disappear-until-i-open-the-unread-things/34236/7 "2015-10-08T08:01:57Z")

</div>

I am very against making it so you force people to visit a post of theirs that was liked, “just because”. Maybe an option to force people to visit mentions and replies… I don’t know.

 ![](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/3X/2/d/2d894e8448dcf27b2fe66e289c251549edd2baa0.png)

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-not-unread-count-not-disappear-until-i-open-the-unread-things/34236)._