# A contagem de "não lido" não deveria desaparecer até que eu abra as coisas não lidas?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-not-unread-count-not-disappear-until-i-open-the-unread-things/34236>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [7 Outubro , 2015 18:51 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-not-unread-count-not-disappear-until-i-open-the-unread-things/34236 "2015-10-07T18:51:27Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![meglio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/meglio/32/71444_2.png) [@meglio](https://meta.discourse.org/u/meglio)\
**Post date:** [8 Outubro , 2015 08:38 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-not-unread-count-not-disappear-until-i-open-the-unread-things/34236/8 "2015-10-08T08:38:40Z")

</div>

> [@sam](#):
>
> I am very against making it so you force people to visit a post of theirs that was liked

Agree, it does not make sense.

However, hiding count of unread replies without reading the replies makes no sense either? Actually, I’m worried about users postponing replying in topics and then forgetting about it. I can see even my mods do forget replying to questions asked in the “Staff” category - and when I phone them, they tell me “oops, I forgot”. The “unread” reminder should be visible at a glance. If that’s not what you’re going to do, may I ask you to make it configurable in Settings?

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/should-not-unread-count-not-disappear-until-i-open-the-unread-things/34236)._