# Grund für die Auslösung der Freigabe in der Freigabewarteschlange anzeigen

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/show-reason-for-approval-being-triggered-on-approval-queue/84702
**Category:** Support
**Created:** [6. April 2018 um 09:55 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/show-reason-for-approval-being-triggered-on-approval-queue/84702 "2018-04-06T09:55:25Z")
**Posts on this page:** 9
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![merefield](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/merefield/32/176214_2.png) [@merefield](https://meta.discourse.org/u/merefield)
#### Post date: [6. April 2018 um 09:55 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/show-reason-for-approval-being-triggered-on-approval-queue/84702/1 "2018-04-06T09:55:25Z")

</div>

I received an post approval request today, but on the approval page I cannot see why the post triggered a silence and an approval workflow.

When I check the logs, I can see user was silenced for ‘typing too fast’.

Might it be possible to display this reason next to the post in the approval page?

Am I missing something?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![cpradio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/cpradio/32/4970_2.png) [@cpradio](https://meta.discourse.org/u/cpradio)
#### Post date: [6. April 2018 um 10:14 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/show-reason-for-approval-being-triggered-on-approval-queue/84702/2 "2018-04-06T10:14:08Z")

</div>

> [@merefield](#):
>
> When I check the logs, I can see user was silenced for ‘typing too fast’.
> 
> Might it be possible to display this action next to the post in the approval page?

That is the ONLY reason they would appear on that queue.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![merefield](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/merefield/32/176214_2.png) [@merefield](https://meta.discourse.org/u/merefield)
#### Post date: [6. April 2018 um 10:19 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/show-reason-for-approval-being-triggered-on-approval-queue/84702/3 "2018-04-06T10:19:58Z")

</div>

That’s the only reason posts appear in the approval queue? What if someone flags?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![cpradio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/cpradio/32/4970_2.png) [@cpradio](https://meta.discourse.org/u/cpradio)
#### Post date: [6. April 2018 um 10:20 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/show-reason-for-approval-being-triggered-on-approval-queue/84702/4 "2018-04-06T10:20:30Z")

</div>

Flags go to Flag Moderation, not the Approval Queue

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![merefield](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/merefield/32/176214_2.png) [@merefield](https://meta.discourse.org/u/merefield)
#### Post date: [6. April 2018 um 10:23 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/show-reason-for-approval-being-triggered-on-approval-queue/84702/5 "2018-04-06T10:23:58Z")

</div>

Thanks for clarification!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![nawthor](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/nawthor/32/71115_2.png) [@nawthor](https://meta.discourse.org/u/nawthor)
#### Post date: [6. April 2018 um 10:48 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/show-reason-for-approval-being-triggered-on-approval-queue/84702/6 "2018-04-06T10:48:29Z")

</div>

> [@cpradio](#):
>
> That is the ONLY reason they would appear on that queue.

Not entirely true. It’s possible to make it so that every post or topic by users below a certain trust level goes through the approval queue with the site settings “approve unless trust level” and “approve new topics unless trust level”. (Maybe also “approve post count”, but I don’t have experience with that one).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![cpradio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/cpradio/32/4970_2.png) [@cpradio](https://meta.discourse.org/u/cpradio)
#### Post date: [6. April 2018 um 11:54 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/show-reason-for-approval-being-triggered-on-approval-queue/84702/7 "2018-04-06T11:54:25Z")

</div>

> [@nawthor](#):
>
> Not entirely true. It’s possible to make it so that every post or topic by users below a certain trust level goes through the approval queue with the site settings “approve unless trust level” and “approve new topics unless trust level”. (Maybe also “approve post count”, but I don’t have experience with that one).

Okay, that’s fair, but if you enabled that, the new assumption is you know why the post is there. As that would become the ONLY reason for it to be there. As the “Fast Typing” rule, IIRC, only applies to TL0 users (maybe TL1?)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Mittineague](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/mittineague/32/114259_2.png) [@Mittineague](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Mittineague)
#### Post date: [6. April 2018 um 20:05 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/show-reason-for-approval-being-triggered-on-approval-queue/84702/8 "2018-04-06T20:05:15Z")

</div>

> [@cpradio](#):
>
> That is the ONLY reason they would appear on that queue.

Yes, I’ve been hoping that eventually the Screened URLs list would send posts into the approval queue instead of “do nothing” but it hasn’t happened yet. eg.

```plaintext
SELECT COUNT(*) 
FROM `screened-url-180328` 
WHERE `action` NOT LIKE 'do nothing';
.....
[COUNT(*)] => 0

```

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![JammyDodger](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/jammydodger/32/254611_2.png) [@JammyDodger](https://meta.discourse.org/u/JammyDodger)
#### Post date: [8. Juni 2024 um 12:37 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/show-reason-for-approval-being-triggered-on-approval-queue/84702/9 "2024-06-08T12:37:36Z")

</div>

Dieses Thema wurde nach 2255 Tagen automatisch geschlossen. Neue Antworten sind nicht mehr gestattet.
