# Showing title edit and category changes as replies **URL:** \ **Category:** Feature\ **Created:** [2015 年 7 月 14 日午前 9:52 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/showing-title-edit-and-category-changes-as-replies/31034 "2015-07-14T09:52:02Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 7
**Author:** ![cpradio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/cpradio/32/4970_2.png) [@cpradio](https://meta.discourse.org/u/cpradio)\ **Post date:** [2015 年 7 月 14 日午前 11:23 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/showing-title-edit-and-category-changes-as-replies/31034/7 "2015-07-14T11:23:17Z")
I think I’m on the side with @erlend_sh, I’m not sure a typical participant cares that the category/title were changed. As a participant, why would I care if this topic was moved from Feature to Bug or to UX? I wouldn’t. Why would I care that the title was made more/less descriptive, or a typo was corrected in the title? I wouldn’t. The biggest part that I would care about, is the original post. If that significantly got altered, then I care, as it could alter my response and any future responses. But again, not sure I see that as worth showing an indicator. It would be nice to see if there are metrics for how often a title/category is changed on a relatively active site. > [@codinghorror](#): > > This will extend to many other topic state changes: pin, archive, banner, unlist, and so forth. Any message you used to see in yellow will be in this newer, muted style. These all make sense. Today, they are distracting, especially banner and pin. Unlist, eh… we use that a lot at Sitepoint and it is occasionally nice that it is very noticeable so the user sees it. I’ve always felt their presence was a bit too strong in most cases anyway, so I look forward to them being a bit more muted. --- _[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/showing-title-edit-and-category-changes-as-replies/31034)._