# Sibling categories instead of parent child?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/sibling-categories-instead-of-parent-child/17312>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [7월 7, 2014, 7:04오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/sibling-categories-instead-of-parent-child/17312 "2014-07-07T19:04:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mittineague](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/mittineague/32/114259_2.png) [@Mittineague](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Mittineague)\
**Post date:** [7월 7, 2014, 11:35오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/sibling-categories-instead-of-parent-child/17312/5 "2014-07-07T23:35:56Z")

</div>

So you mean siblings rather than decendants?

I’ve seen this in sub-category relationships, but not really in any forum-wide.

How to convey such a relationship other than by similar names eg.  
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ beginning  
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ advanced

would indeed interest me.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/sibling-categories-instead-of-parent-child/17312)._
