# Site title being used in subject, despite email prefix being used

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/site-title-being-used-in-subject-despite-email-prefix-being-used/29578>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [3 Giugno 2015, 1:10am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/site-title-being-used-in-subject-despite-email-prefix-being-used/29578 "2015-06-03T01:10:11Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![downey](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/downey/32/166878_2.png) [@downey](https://meta.discourse.org/u/downey)\
**Post date:** [3 Giugno 2015, 5:13pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/site-title-being-used-in-subject-despite-email-prefix-being-used/29578/5 "2015-06-03T17:13:39Z")

</div>

I’m not sure this is a good idea. Notifications are received very often, perhaps every day. For those, a short slug works well.

The idea with a digest is it’s received only occasionally, and reminding people to come back to the site. Having the short slug version may not make it obvious from the subject line what the email is about or who/where it’s from. Especially now that the subject is shortened to just “Digest” with no date, the subject line shouldn’t be too long in most situations.

I for one want the full site title in the “come back” digest, just not the hundreds-per-day notifications.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/site-title-being-used-in-subject-despite-email-prefix-being-used/29578)._