# Some issues with staged users and their (in)ability to visit topics

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/some-issues-with-staged-users-and-their-in-ability-to-visit-topics/40084>\
**Category:** UX\
**Created:** [24. Februar 2016 um 11:10 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/some-issues-with-staged-users-and-their-in-ability-to-visit-topics/40084 "2016-02-24T11:10:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fefrei](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/fefrei/32/119538_2.png) [@fefrei](https://meta.discourse.org/u/fefrei)\
**Post date:** [29. Februar 2016 um 14:55 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/some-issues-with-staged-users-and-their-in-ability-to-visit-topics/40084/7 "2016-02-29T14:55:29Z")

</div>

I’m not sure I like the idea of removing that line.

> [@Sander78](#):
>
> Staged users have no awareness of the back office (Discourse) that is behind their emails.

In some sense, they do: The formatting of these mails make it clear that they were sent by some automatic system. It is _so_ common for these systems to have `noreply@...`-addresses that I usually automatically think I cannot simply reply by mail as soon as a mail doesn’t look hand-composed.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/some-issues-with-staged-users-and-their-in-ability-to-visit-topics/40084)._