# Armazene uma revisão real para edições com período de carência longo

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/store-a-real-revision-for-large-grace-period-edits/81614>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [Fevereiro 26, 2018, 11:43pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/store-a-real-revision-for-large-grace-period-edits/81614 "2018-02-26T23:43:08Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 18

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jomaxro](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/jomaxro/32/126216_2.png) [@jomaxro](https://meta.discourse.org/u/jomaxro)\
**Post date:** [Março 7, 2018, 9:33pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/store-a-real-revision-for-large-grace-period-edits/81614/18 "2018-03-07T21:33:27Z")

</div>

Wait…if we’re increasing this setting to 100 (or even more) I think we still need the `Disable edit grace period for TL0 users by default` feature. 100 characters is plenty of room for a user to turn a valid post into spam, add an inappropriate image, etc. without triggering an edit log.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/store-a-real-revision-for-large-grace-period-edits/81614)._