# Styling based on group membership

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/styling-based-on-group-membership/12031>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [17 Gennaio 2014, 11:12pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/styling-based-on-group-membership/12031 "2014-01-17T23:12:35Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![riking](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/riking/32/170938_2.png) [@riking](https://meta.discourse.org/u/riking)\
**Post date:** [17 Gennaio 2014, 11:32pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/styling-based-on-group-membership/12031/3 "2014-01-17T23:32:30Z")

</div>

Say, something like this:

 ![](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/2X/4/494de2a1d753ccfa0314c6cccfed52e9c6189810.png) 

Which would be given with

```css
article.group-bb-writers div.topic-body {
    background-color: rgb(202, 233, 207);
}

```

The existing per-user customization, the highlighted name and title, might not be enough for some people: [Reddit - Please wait for verification](http://www.reddit.com/r/___/comments/131pv2/mutiny/)

(that subreddit is a little bit, ah, _crazy_ with its CSS customizations…)

```css
div.usertext-body div.md *:first-child::first-letter {
  text-transform: lowercase;
  text-decoration: underline;
}

```

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/styling-based-on-group-membership/12031)._
