# サブカテゴリはセキュリティ設定を継承しません

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/subcategory-does-not-inherit-security-settings/101122>\
**Category:** Product Support\
**Created:** [2018 年 11 月 2 日午前 8:57 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/subcategory-does-not-inherit-security-settings/101122 "2018-11-02T08:57:52Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mishka](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/mishka/32/126223_2.png) [@mishka](https://meta.discourse.org/u/mishka)\
**Post date:** [2018 年 11 月 2 日午後 1:18 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/subcategory-does-not-inherit-security-settings/101122/4 "2018-11-02T13:18:03Z")

</div>

I believe it is counterintuitive. If you are disabling access to a book, you are disabling all pages, not just the cover.

May be it should be something like this?

- On subcategory creation: copy security settings of the parent.
- On changing parent permissions: ask admin if he wants to recursivly iterate over all children and update them.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/subcategory-does-not-inherit-security-settings/101122)._