# Suggestion for /admin/upgrade#/

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/suggestion-for-admin-upgrade/65000
**Category:** Feature
**Created:** [June 23, 2017, 7:00am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/suggestion-for-admin-upgrade/65000 "2017-06-23T07:00:16Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![JagWaugh](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/jagwaugh/32/69335_2.png) [@JagWaugh](https://meta.discourse.org/u/JagWaugh)
#### Post date: [June 23, 2017, 7:00am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/suggestion-for-admin-upgrade/65000/1 "2017-06-23T07:00:16Z")

</div>

I’m not sure how difficult this would be to implement.

Lately there have been a few issues with people’s instances failing rebuild or not working because of broken plugins.

The status of plugins is monitored here on meta.

A third column in /admin/upgrade#/ which indicated “Broken” or “Suspect” would give a headsup to people before they get themselves in trouble.

Even just a “Check status” which pointed to [https://meta.discourse.org/t/](https://meta.discourse.org/t/) _plugin_ might be worth considering.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![sam](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/sam/32/102149_2.png) [@sam](https://meta.discourse.org/u/sam)
#### Post date: [May 15, 2025, 12:27am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/suggestion-for-admin-upgrade/65000/3 "2025-05-15T00:27:20Z")

</div>

I think there is certainly merit in calling out “official” vs “unofficial” on the page, reaching out to meta directo from the page feel a little intrusive and risky. I removed the pr-welcome for now cause we need a lot more information and maybe a visual mock of the suggestion here prior to asking 3rd party developers to build.
