# 关于 wysiwyg 辩论的总结结果

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/summary-outcome-of-the-debate-on-wysiwyg/41413>\
**Category:** Support\
**Created:** [2016年三月22日 10:14 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/summary-outcome-of-the-debate-on-wysiwyg/41413 "2016-03-22T10:14:06Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ljpp](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/ljpp/32/96506_2.png) [@ljpp](https://meta.discourse.org/u/ljpp)\
**Post date:** [2016年三月22日 10:43 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/summary-outcome-of-the-debate-on-wysiwyg/41413/2 "2016-03-22T10:43:03Z")

</div>

I think Jeff put it very clearly here:

> [@Who would prefer a standard wysiwyg to markdown?](https://meta.discourse.org/t/who-would-prefer-a-standard-wysiwyg-to-markdown/31340/71):
>
> There is 0.0% probability of that happening, the technical hurdles are quite severe. Lots of assumptions about the pipeline. So I feel this is a harmful fantasy. If you really “need” wysiwyg you should choose some other software. Full stop.

I have a high(ish) traffic, yet low user count, non-tech forum and the editor has not been a concern for my audience. And yes, they have raised lots of other concerns, but I don’t think that the editor/wysiwyg thing was never brought up. The new forum was constructed as an open community project, so they all had opportunities to contribute (and they did).

We migrated from SMF.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/summary-outcome-of-the-debate-on-wysiwyg/41413)._