# Support Docker v0.9.1 and up

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/support-docker-v0-9-1-and-up/15154>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [29 أبريل 2014، 8:49ص UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/support-docker-v0-9-1-and-up/15154 "2014-04-29T08:49:08Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sam](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/sam/32/102149_2.png) [@sam](https://meta.discourse.org/u/sam)\
**Post date:** [30 أبريل 2014، 2:27ص UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/support-docker-v0-9-1-and-up/15154/4 "2014-04-30T02:27:02Z")

</div>

Yes totally fine with improvements to the logic.

I am also happy to amend the logic so you can bypass the pre-flight checks. Eg:

```plaintext
./launcher --no-check bootstrap app

```

This will require quite a few changes internally, but should allow you to simply alias it without needing to fork the launcher script.

I am against supporting 0.9.1 cause you will be in for a shock when your containers stop after upgrading to 0.10, I am fairly confident this will **not** be fixed with the 0.11 upgrade, the internal design changed in a breaking way.

cc @SvenDowideit

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/support-docker-v0-9-1-and-up/15154)._