# Support for Mistral API

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/support-for-mistral-api/289811>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Tags:** ai\
**Created:** [December 26, 2023, 9:16pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/support-for-mistral-api/289811 "2023-12-26T21:16:44Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sam](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/sam/32/102149_2.png) [@sam](https://meta.discourse.org/u/sam)\
**Post date:** [December 26, 2023, 9:40pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/support-for-mistral-api/289811/2 "2023-12-26T21:40:00Z")

</div>

@Falco just landed mixtral today via vLLM.

@Roman is working on refactoring our internal implementation so bot can lean on our new “generic LLM” interface.

I agree about rethinking all AI settings when it comes to LLMs, the patterns we need outgrow what you can do in site settings.

A new interface listing all LLMs you have access to, explaining endpoints / params / quotas and more is very much something we need to start thinking about. The current way is just a bit too limited and given there are infinity models out there, we need a new paradigm here.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/support-for-mistral-api/289811)._