# "Suspect users" not behaving as expected?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/suspect-users-not-behaving-as-expected/39791>\
**Category:** Support\
**Created:** [18 Febbraio 2016, 10:39am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/suspect-users-not-behaving-as-expected/39791 "2016-02-18T10:39:57Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![codinghorror](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/codinghorror/32/110067_2.png) [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)\
**Post date:** [18 Febbraio 2016, 4:41pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/suspect-users-not-behaving-as-expected/39791/7 "2016-02-18T16:41:38Z")

</div>

> [@steve\_pd](#):
>
> the definition of a Suspect User been changed?

These are users with a completed profile but zero or very near zero read time. That is all.

Signup of more than 2 new users at the same IP, who do not share IP with any staff users at @DeanMarkTaylor correctly noted, is blocked via a site setting. You can test this but you need a unique IP. It was working a week or so ago.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/suspect-users-not-behaving-as-expected/39791)._