# Tags for staff private messages
**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/tags-for-staff-private-messages/47702
**Category:** Feature
**Created:** [7월 24, 2016, 9:28오전 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/tags-for-staff-private-messages/47702 "2016-07-24T09:28:27Z")
**Posts on this page:** 8
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@tobiaseigen](https://meta.discourse.org/u/tobiaseigen)
#### Post date: [7월 24, 2016, 9:28오전 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/tags-for-staff-private-messages/47702/1 "2016-07-24T09:28:27Z")
I’d very much like to be able to use tags in private messages, and especially staff tasks, to help my team manage all the correspondence piling up in messages and use messaging as a way to directly provide support to members and track an issue all the way through resolution, like a task tracker.
The ability to add tags like new, inprogress, waitingonsomeone, completed would be a big help.
---
### Author:  [@sam](https://meta.discourse.org/u/sam)
#### Post date: [7월 25, 2016, 12:15오전 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/tags-for-staff-private-messages/47702/2 "2016-07-25T00:15:49Z")
I think a good version 1 of this feature would be a site setting, default disabled.
“Allow staff to set tags on messages”
---
### Author:  [@tobiaseigen](https://meta.discourse.org/u/tobiaseigen)
#### Post date: [3월 12, 2017, 3:31오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/tags-for-staff-private-messages/47702/3 "2017-03-12T15:31:22Z")
Is this #pr-welcome or a feature you’d consider adding to your roadmap? I do miss it, especially now that we have the ASSIGN and SOLVED features working so nicely together.
---
### Author:  [@sam](https://meta.discourse.org/u/sam)
#### Post date: [3월 12, 2017, 3:33오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/tags-for-staff-private-messages/47702/4 "2017-03-12T15:33:58Z")
Sure I think a pr is welcome here, but it is a fairly advanced change
---
### Author:  [@tobiaseigen](https://meta.discourse.org/u/tobiaseigen)
#### Post date: [3월 12, 2017, 3:38오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/tags-for-staff-private-messages/47702/5 "2017-03-12T15:38:45Z")
ok - got it. thanks! will take a look at this among our wishlist of priorities.
---
### Author:  [@downey](https://meta.discourse.org/u/downey)
#### Post date: [11월 13, 2017, 11:19오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/tags-for-staff-private-messages/47702/6 "2017-11-13T23:19:42Z")
It has been 8 months, so at risk of being a “bumper” I just was hoping to determine whether or not this would still be a “fairly advanced change”. Would be great for organizing when a forum had a high number of personal messages…
---
### Author:  [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)
#### Post date: [11월 13, 2017, 11:22오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/tags-for-staff-private-messages/47702/7 "2017-11-13T23:22:36Z")
It’s on the 2.0 roadmap so I’m just gonna close this for now. Feel free to browse #releases
---
### Author:  [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)
#### Post date: [11월 13, 2017, 11:22오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/tags-for-staff-private-messages/47702/8 "2017-11-13T23:22:41Z")