# Os editores já não são mais "novos" e "padrão", certo?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/the-editors-are-not-new-and-standard-anymore-by-now/415025>\
**Category:** UX\
**Created:** [Outubro 19, 2026, 11:36am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/the-editors-are-not-new-and-standard-anymore-by-now/415025 "2026-10-19T11:36:17Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RGJ](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/rgj/32/523185_2.png) [@RGJ](https://meta.discourse.org/u/RGJ)\
**Post date:** [Outubro 19, 2026, 11:36am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/the-editors-are-not-new-and-standard-anymore-by-now/415025/1 "2026-10-19T11:36:17Z")

</div>

As dicas de ferramenta (tooltips) do editor de Markdown/richtext dizem:

“Alternar para o **novo** editor de texto rico”  
e  
“Alternar para o editor de Markdown **padrão** ”

Esse tipo de texto não envelhece bem. Sugiro remover as palavras “novo” e “padrão” aqui.

 ![image](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/4X/f/1/0/f10ef74959ad763d1359b4144144bb9bbe9c71f3.png)

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/the-editors-are-not-new-and-standard-anymore-by-now/415025)._