# Theme-components category

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/theme-components-category/233091
**Category:** Site feedback
**Created:** [July 17, 2022, 11:23am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/theme-components-category/233091 "2022-07-17T11:23:31Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Decorbuz](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/decorbuz/32/235124_2.png) [@Decorbuz](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Decorbuz)
#### Post date: [July 18, 2022, 1:27am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/theme-components-category/233091/3 "2022-07-18T01:27:34Z")

</div>

> [@Canapin](#):
>
> I like that they have their own category now.

Yeah, I’m glad that this change has finally been made. It’s something that I asked for a while back.

> [@"theme-component" should be a subcategory instead of a tag](https://meta.discourse.org/t/theme-component-should-be-a-subcategory-instead-of-a-tag/223862):
>
> In my opinion, I think that the #Customization > Theme component tag would serve its purpose better as a subcategory. At least for me, they’re easier to find compared to tags, and in recent years, theme components have become more and more significant in contrast to their #Customization > Plugin counterparts (many of which are being converted to theme components for easier use). For lack of a better term, they deserve… “equal” treatment. After all, they’re extremely popular and are very much an in…

I wonder why it isn’t a subcategory though? 🤔

> [@JammyDodger](#):
>
> It feels more natural to have them as plural, but I’ll see what everyone else thinks first. 🙂

If you’re going to make it plural, you should also make #Customization > Theme, #Customization > Plugin, etc… plural.

You should also consider removing the line in between “theme” and components" since categories aren’t limited in the same sense as tags.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/theme-components-category/233091)._