# “共有 84 条回复，预计阅读时间为 0 分钟。”

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/there-are-84-replies-with-an-estimated-read-time-of-0-minutes/119628
**Category:** Support
**Created:** [2019 年6 月 6 日 05:15 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/there-are-84-replies-with-an-estimated-read-time-of-0-minutes/119628 "2019-06-06T05:15:05Z")
**Posts on this page:** 10
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### 作者： ![uwe\_keim](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/uwe_keim/32/326762_2.png) [@uwe\_keim](https://meta.discourse.org/u/uwe_keim)
#### 发布日期： [2019 年6 月 6 日 05:15 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/there-are-84-replies-with-an-estimated-read-time-of-0-minutes/119628/1 "2019-06-06T05:15:05Z")

</div>

I have a forum post where I simply collect images of developer memes:

> **[Lustige Entwickler-Programmierer-Memes](https://entwicklergate.de/t/lustige-entwickler-programmierer-memes/371)**
>
> Kurze Ablenkung für Zwischendurch. Habt Ihr auch lustige Bilder, Videos und Memes rund ums Programmieren? Dann nichts wie her damit und hier posten!

The summary below the introduction post says (in German):

> Es gibt **84** Antworten mit einer geschätzten Lesezeit von **0 Minuten**.

This translates to English as:

> There are **84** replies with an estimated read time of **0 minutes**.

In my opinion, it will take _more_ than zero minutes to “read” (i.e. look at) the images.

### Suggestion

My suggestion would be to have a minimum value of **1** (instead of 0) for the estimated reading time to cover edge cases like mine with actually zero text but only images.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### 作者： ![codinghorror](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/codinghorror/32/110067_2.png) [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)
#### 发布日期： [2019 年6 月 6 日 05:19 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/there-are-84-replies-with-an-estimated-read-time-of-0-minutes/119628/2 "2019-06-06T05:19:05Z")

</div>

This is rather funny 🖼

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### 作者： ![sam](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/sam/32/102149_2.png) [@sam](https://meta.discourse.org/u/sam)
#### 发布日期： [2019 年6 月 6 日 07:10 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/there-are-84-replies-with-an-estimated-read-time-of-0-minutes/119628/3 "2019-06-06T07:10:22Z")

</div>

Yeah I agree, I don’t think any post can be read in less than say 2 seconds. So we should start there with 2 seconds as a minimum.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### 作者： ![zogstrip](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/zogstrip/32/512781_2.png) [@zogstrip](https://meta.discourse.org/u/zogstrip)
#### 发布日期： [2019 年6 月 6 日 07:57 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/there-are-84-replies-with-an-estimated-read-time-of-0-minutes/119628/4 "2019-06-06T07:57:51Z")

</div>

@maja can you add that to your list?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### 作者： ![uwe\_keim](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/uwe_keim/32/326762_2.png) [@uwe\_keim](https://meta.discourse.org/u/uwe_keim)
#### 发布日期： [2019 年6 月 6 日 09:04 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/there-are-84-replies-with-an-estimated-read-time-of-0-minutes/119628/5 "2019-06-06T09:04:29Z")

</div>

I dont’ know how your algorithm calculates the time. I guess based on the number of characters and/or words.

If I’m correct here, how about adding a factor for every image, too?

Maybe even different factors for small/medium/large images?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### 作者： ![Yuun](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/y/977dab/32.png) [@Yuun](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Yuun)
#### 发布日期： [2019 年6 月 6 日 12:57 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/there-are-84-replies-with-an-estimated-read-time-of-0-minutes/119628/6 "2019-06-06T12:57:47Z")

</div>

Well, a picture is worth a thousand words, so

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### 作者： ![codinghorror](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/codinghorror/32/110067_2.png) [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)
#### 发布日期： [2019 年6 月 6 日 13:05 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/there-are-84-replies-with-an-estimated-read-time-of-0-minutes/119628/7 "2019-06-06T13:05:22Z")

</div>

![image](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/3X/7/8/78bcc93551926d1927fb38b1b8b3e3449ce934a8.gif)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### 作者： ![zogstrip](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/zogstrip/32/512781_2.png) [@zogstrip](https://meta.discourse.org/u/zogstrip)
#### 发布日期： [2019 年7 月 1 日 15:46 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/there-are-84-replies-with-an-estimated-read-time-of-0-minutes/119628/8 "2019-07-01T15:46:35Z")

</div>

@nbianca 你能把这个加到你的列表里吗？

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### 作者： ![nbianca](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/nbianca/32/157984_2.png) [@nbianca](https://meta.discourse.org/u/nbianca)
#### 发布日期： [2019 年7 月 2 日 13:43 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/there-are-84-replies-with-an-estimated-read-time-of-0-minutes/119628/9 "2019-07-02T13:43:21Z")

</div>

我将 `floor` 替换为 `ceil` 操作，以确保我们始终显示至少“1 分钟”。

此外，该逻辑会尝试在旧公式（单词数 / 阅读速度）和最小阅读时间（每篇帖子 4 秒；之所以是 4 秒，是因为我阅读一篇短帖子或查看图片并滚动到下一篇帖子所需的时间）之间取最大值。⌛

针对该主题，公式计算结果为 6 分钟。我实际阅读该主题用时略少于 6 分钟，因此我认为效果不错。🤓

> <https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/7842>

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### 作者： ![codinghorror](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/codinghorror/32/110067_2.png) [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)
#### 发布日期： [2019 年7 月 2 日 22:44 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/there-are-84-replies-with-an-estimated-read-time-of-0-minutes/119628/10 "2019-07-02T22:44:31Z")

</div>


