# This topic is clearly important to you – you've posted more than 25% of the replies here

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/this-topic-is-clearly-important-to-you-youve-posted-more-than-25-of-the-replies-here/55857>\
**Category:** UX\
**Created:** [Janeiro 16, 2017, 5:59pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/this-topic-is-clearly-important-to-you-youve-posted-more-than-25-of-the-replies-here/55857 "2017-01-16T17:59:11Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ChrisBeach](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/chrisbeach/32/214628_2.png) [@ChrisBeach](https://meta.discourse.org/u/ChrisBeach)\
**Post date:** [Janeiro 16, 2017, 11:31pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/this-topic-is-clearly-important-to-you-youve-posted-more-than-25-of-the-replies-here/55857/5 "2017-01-16T23:31:00Z")

</div>

A member was affected enough to [comment on this warning today](https://se23.life/t/neighbourhood-plan-crofton-park-and-honor-oak-consultation-14th-jan/2156/51?u=chrisbeach).

Whilst I agree with this type of warning in principle and want to avoid forum domination I think the logic could be finessed to take into account the number of likes received by the poster on the current thread. If the user has an above-average number of likes they should be able to post without encountering the warning.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/this-topic-is-clearly-important-to-you-youve-posted-more-than-25-of-the-replies-here/55857)._
