# This Week's Users includes users with no activity

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/this-weeks-users-includes-users-with-no-activity/28773>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [13. Mai 2015 um 16:43 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/this-weeks-users-includes-users-with-no-activity/28773 "2015-05-13T16:43:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BCHK](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/bchk/32/3268_2.png) [@BCHK](https://meta.discourse.org/u/BCHK)\
**Post date:** [13. Mai 2015 um 23:19 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/this-weeks-users-includes-users-with-no-activity/28773/3 "2015-05-13T23:19:11Z")

</div>

Well OK - I guess I’m unclear on why that would be, for “This week’s Users” list.

But - whatever the case - it seems that the zero column users should be grouped at the bottom and not sprinkled throughout the list rather randomly as currently seems to be the case.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/this-weeks-users-includes-users-with-no-activity/28773)._