# This Week's Users includes users with no activity

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/this-weeks-users-includes-users-with-no-activity/28773>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [13. Mai 2015 um 16:43 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/this-weeks-users-includes-users-with-no-activity/28773 "2015-05-13T16:43:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eviltrout](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/eviltrout/32/5275_2.png) [@eviltrout](https://meta.discourse.org/u/eviltrout)\
**Post date:** [27. Februar 2017 um 16:27 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/this-weeks-users-includes-users-with-no-activity/28773/8 "2017-02-27T16:27:53Z")

</div>

It’s been so long I don’t even remember. I just reviewed the query and the user has to be `active` which means a validated email - that would have to be faked quite explicitly from an import.

I guess the big question is: is a row of zeros desirable or should we exclude them?

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/this-weeks-users-includes-users-with-no-activity/28773)._