# Threaded discussion is ultimately too complex to survive on the public Internet?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/threaded-discussion-is-ultimately-too-complex-to-survive-on-the-public-internet/63172>\
**Category:** UX\
**Created:** [2017年五月23日 02:43 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/threaded-discussion-is-ultimately-too-complex-to-survive-on-the-public-internet/63172 "2017-05-23T02:43:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 54

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![roke\_julian\_lockhart](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/roke_julian_lockhart/32/540179_2.png) [@roke\_julian\_lockhart](https://meta.discourse.org/u/roke_julian_lockhart)\
**Post date:** [2024年四月15日 08:54 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/threaded-discussion-is-ultimately-too-complex-to-survive-on-the-public-internet/63172/54 "2024-04-15T08:54:32Z")

</div>

> [@piffy](#):
>
> 当你只打算一次性查看某条内容时，它确实有效，让你能够深入挖掘。但如果你在不断地重新打开和跟进同一个话题，就像在 Discourse 的环境中一样，要理清讨论的网状结构会很复杂。

@piffy，不过这对我来说不是这样。我从未觉得与层级式讨论互动比与扁平式讨论更困难，而扁平式讨论对我来说，一旦对话主题发生变化和/或超过 2 个人参与，在认知上就会变得困难。

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/threaded-discussion-is-ultimately-too-complex-to-survive-on-the-public-internet/63172)._