# Threaded discussion is ultimately too complex to survive on the public Internet?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/threaded-discussion-is-ultimately-too-complex-to-survive-on-the-public-internet/63172>\
**Category:** UX\
**Created:** [2017年五月23日 02:43 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/threaded-discussion-is-ultimately-too-complex-to-survive-on-the-public-internet/63172 "2017-05-23T02:43:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 59

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![roke\_julian\_lockhart](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/roke_julian_lockhart/32/540179_2.png) [@roke\_julian\_lockhart](https://meta.discourse.org/u/roke_julian_lockhart)\
**Post date:** [2024年四月15日 17:24 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/threaded-discussion-is-ultimately-too-complex-to-survive-on-the-public-internet/63172/59 "2024-04-15T17:24:14Z")

</div>

@piffy,

> ****
>
> > [@piffy](#):
> >
> > If you’re going to link simple concepts from wikipedia, you should at least read the page yourself because it explains why a logical extreme is a useful rhetorical device.
> 
> 这不是一个有用的逻辑技巧，因此引用了说明。另外，我随后解释了为什么它没有用，所以你为什么要求解释？
> 
> > [@piffy](#):
> >
> > The point is that a good discussion will require some amount of cognitive load so it shouldn’t be the primary variable to optimize.
> 
> 如果你之前澄清过这一点，我就不会提了。我同意，但既然没有人声称相反，我仍然不明白它的相关性。

> [@piffy](#):
>
> The primary question is whether or not better discussions emerge from a flat format or a threaded one. I don’t know the answer but my impression is that because a threaded discussion typically gives you a narrow and engineered view of a topic and is hard to revisit, that overall the quality of the discussion is affected.

我不认为这是需要解决的主要问题，因为用户可以选择以扁平格式还是线程格式查看讨论并不重要——每个用户根据个人喜好选择。所有回复都已在 GUI 下方进行线程化（这就是为什么除了线程底部有一个重复的蓝色回复按钮外，还有一个“回复”功能），所以这仅仅是将其暴露给用户的问题。

* * *

@Sailsman63,

> [@Sailsman63](#):
>
> It’s about the fact that one of those replies is on page **2** of an 8 page discussion.

你指的是哪个 8 页的讨论？如果你描述的是一个假设的线程化和分页讨论，解决该问题的方法就是不分页线程。

> [@Sailsman63](#):
>
> It’s not about the indentation.

什么不是关于缩进？

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/threaded-discussion-is-ultimately-too-complex-to-survive-on-the-public-internet/63172)._