# 未读计数未计入已删除的帖子

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/unread-count-does-not-take-removed-posts-into-account/217351>\
**Category:** Bug\
**Created:** [2022年二月7日 16:15 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/unread-count-does-not-take-removed-posts-into-account/217351 "2022-02-07T16:15:17Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Moin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/moin/32/554653_2.png) [@Moin](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Moin)\
**Post date:** [2022年二月7日 16:36 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/unread-count-does-not-take-removed-posts-into-account/217351/2 "2022-02-07T16:36:25Z")

</div>

> [@Number of unread replies is different than number of topic replies due to reply deletions](https://meta.discourse.org/t/number-of-unread-replies-is-different-than-number-of-topic-replies-due-to-reply-deletions/142244/2):
>
> We have had this reported a few times before, it is fiendishly hard to fix. If a large number of posts are deleted then unread count is artificially incredibly high. We could I guess do a client fix that caps numbers but it just replaces imperfect with more imperfect. Problem with counting deleted replies is that there is no cheap way of do it. You may have read 17 of the 32 deleted replies.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/unread-count-does-not-take-removed-posts-into-account/217351)._
