# Update beschrijving van instelling "tl3 tijdperiode"

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/update-description-of-setting-tl3-time-period/269313
**Category:** UX
**Created:** [22 juni 2023 om 19:37 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/update-description-of-setting-tl3-time-period/269313 "2023-06-22T19:37:54Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![jordan-violet](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/jordan-violet/32/281428_2.png) [@jordan-violet](https://meta.discourse.org/u/jordan-violet)
#### Post date: [22 juni 2023 om 19:37 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/update-description-of-setting-tl3-time-period/269313/1 "2023-06-22T19:37:55Z")

</div>

The current description reads:

> Trust Level 3 requirements time period (in days)

I shared that this description is confusing as it isn’t quite descript to the uninitiated:

> [@Clarification on "tl3 time period" setting description](https://meta.discourse.org/t/clarification-on-tl3-time-period-setting-description/269309):
>
> The description currently says: Trust Level 3 requirements time period (in days) time period in days…what? Time period in days they have to have been active? Time period in days that they have to have been a user? I feel like there’s a second half of this sentence that is missing.

I would propose something to the effect of:

> Time period (in days) in which all Trust Level 3 requirements are determined against.

I would even go as far as to say that the name could be more descript. While longer, something pragmatic like `tl3 requirements time period` would be great too.