# Users from Twitter login flagged as suspect users

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/users-from-twitter-login-flagged-as-suspect-users/207377
**Category:** Support
**Created:** [October 28, 2021, 8:00am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/users-from-twitter-login-flagged-as-suspect-users/207377 "2021-10-28T08:00:09Z")
**Posts on this page:** 4
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![nick3](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/nick3/32/238016_2.png) [@nick3](https://meta.discourse.org/u/nick3)
#### Post date: [October 28, 2021, 8:00am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/users-from-twitter-login-flagged-as-suspect-users/207377/1 "2021-10-28T08:00:09Z")

</div>

I have noticed a lot of Suspect users alerts, but all of them on review appeared to be genuine users. However I have noticed a pattern that that all the supect flags were for users who created their account via Twitter login, which automatically fills out their profile.

Was it the design intention for all Twitter logins to fall under suspicion in this way?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![IAmGav](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/iamgav/32/235598_2.png) [@IAmGav](https://meta.discourse.org/u/IAmGav)
#### Post date: [October 28, 2021, 2:01pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/users-from-twitter-login-flagged-as-suspect-users/207377/2 "2021-10-28T14:01:33Z")

</div>

> [@nick3](#):
>
> Was it the design intention for all Twitter logins

Nope.

it is a social login with facebook and google falls under. so there must be something else triggering it

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![awesomerobot](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/awesomerobot/32/142900_2.png) [@awesomerobot](https://meta.discourse.org/u/awesomerobot)
#### Post date: [October 28, 2021, 2:29pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/users-from-twitter-login-flagged-as-suspect-users/207377/3 "2021-10-28T14:29:55Z")

</div>

Sounds like they might be considered suspect because their profiles are being filled immediately… that’s one of the measures to determine an account “suspect” because a lot of spammers will create an account and immediately add spam to their profile. Maybe Twitter logins should be exempt from that check…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![codinghorror](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/codinghorror/32/110067_2.png) [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)
#### Post date: [October 28, 2021, 8:08pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/users-from-twitter-login-flagged-as-suspect-users/207377/4 "2021-10-28T20:08:10Z")

</div>

It’s not just that – it is a combination of completed user profile and basically _zero_ read time. So it’s still kinda valid.