# View progress towards a badge?

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/view-progress-towards-a-badge/44628
**Category:** Support
**Created:** [May 22, 2016, 6:35pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/view-progress-towards-a-badge/44628 "2016-05-22T18:35:44Z")
**Posts on this page:** 8
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![watchmanmonitor](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/watchmanmonitor/32/430970_2.png) [@watchmanmonitor](https://meta.discourse.org/u/watchmanmonitor)
#### Post date: [May 22, 2016, 6:35pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/view-progress-towards-a-badge/44628/1 "2016-05-22T18:35:44Z")

</div>

Is there a way for me to see my progress towards a badge?

As in, how many likes to need to get/receive to earn back Regular (TL3)?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Digital](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/digital/32/119613_2.png) [@Digital](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Digital)
#### Post date: [May 22, 2016, 6:43pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/view-progress-towards-a-badge/44628/2 "2016-05-22T18:43:14Z")

</div>

I will direct you to this old topic and post your question there:

> [@Add richer individualized data to digest - TripAdvisor style](https://meta.discourse.org/t/add-richer-individualized-data-to-digest-tripadvisor-style/27713/3):
>
> I like these concepts but I think they should be available on your user page the posts you made that were most liked (your “greatest hits”) who you liked the most, who liked you the most popular topics you created next badge progress

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![watchmanmonitor](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/watchmanmonitor/32/430970_2.png) [@watchmanmonitor](https://meta.discourse.org/u/watchmanmonitor)
#### Post date: [May 22, 2016, 6:53pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/view-progress-towards-a-badge/44628/3 "2016-05-22T18:53:09Z")

</div>

Sure, it’s related, and did remind me that I can view my summary for this information:

[https://meta.discourse.org/my/summary](https://meta.discourse.org/my/summary)

But that’s overall, not in a given range.

To take that a step further, I could view:

[https://meta.discourse.org/users?period=quarterly](https://meta.discourse.org/users?period=quarterly)

and interpolate an answer:

[https://meta.discourse.org/users?name=watchmanmonitor&period=quarterly](https://meta.discourse.org/users?name=watchmanmonitor&period=quarterly)

So, it should just be a matter of waiting for a daily reset before I’m back to TL3, bc I think I meet the goals now.

 ![](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/3X/5/7/57256079fad55c80402dc4f0ce159c86f1acc881.png)

but none of this answers my original question.. how can I see how I’m doing for any given badge.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Digital](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/digital/32/119613_2.png) [@Digital](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Digital)
#### Post date: [May 22, 2016, 6:58pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/view-progress-towards-a-badge/44628/4 "2016-05-22T18:58:20Z")

</div>

> [@watchmanmonitor](#):
>
> how I’m doing for any giv

I believe users can’t right now.  
More experienced users or a team member can give you an straight answer.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![purldator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/bcef8e/32.png) [@purldator](https://meta.discourse.org/u/purldator)
#### Post date: [May 22, 2016, 7:15pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/view-progress-towards-a-badge/44628/5 "2016-05-22T19:15:30Z")

</div>

> [@watchmanmonitor](#):
>
> but none of this answers my original question.. how can I see how I’m doing for any given badge.

For Discourse Meta, I suggest PMing one of the staff and asking them for more information.

Generally, users are not meant to see the progress on acquiring a badge, or requirement stats.

> [@Allow users to See their "Trust Level Requirements Report"](https://meta.discourse.org/t/allow-users-to-see-their-trust-level-requirements-report/26702):
>
> I loved the new user directory option added. My users are finding it pretty useful to find out about the most active members of the community. One of the things my users often ask is how long will it take for them to qualify to Trust Level 2 or 3. I often direct them to the trust level requirements page but users loved the option which is available to admins only. I mean the “Requirements For Trust Level X” report as shown below Can’t we allow users to see progress stats about their…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Mittineague](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/mittineague/32/114259_2.png) [@Mittineague](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Mittineague)
#### Post date: [May 22, 2016, 8:55pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/view-progress-towards-a-badge/44628/6 "2016-05-22T20:55:46Z")

</div>

> [@purldator](#):
>
> Generally, users are not meant to see the progress on acquiring a badge, or requirement stats.

IMHO this is how it should be.

That is, for the most part the granting of Badges / Trust Level should be the result of natural activity / an Admin decision.

A lot of requirements can be adjusted by the Admin and indeed, Badges can be granted / revoked and Trust Levels can be granted / revoked / locked independent of any code doing so automatically.

Similar to getting a site to have good position in SERPs, the best advice is to do things naturally.

For Discourse that means:

- visit often
- read much
- show appreciation of other members good posts
- make good posts yourself when you can

It really is that simple. The criteria used are not “perfect” perhaps, but they are very good indicators of a members involvement in the forum.

As for members being able to see other members requirement statistics, heavens no please.  
This could result in less noble emotions gaining a foothold and I see no good coming from it.

As for members seeing their own requirement statistics, true, curiosity is a “normal” human trait, but the ability to see the requirement statistics would likely lead to a lot of extra “work” explaining why certain requirement Settings are what they are and would be extremely awkward if a member had met all the requirements but their Trust Level had been locked.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![watchmanmonitor](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/watchmanmonitor/32/430970_2.png) [@watchmanmonitor](https://meta.discourse.org/u/watchmanmonitor)
#### Post date: [May 22, 2016, 9:17pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/view-progress-towards-a-badge/44628/7 "2016-05-22T21:17:53Z")

</div>

All good thoughts & feedback. I’ve reached out to support. Thanks!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![JammyDodger](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/jammydodger/32/254611_2.png) [@JammyDodger](https://meta.discourse.org/u/JammyDodger)
#### Post date: [June 8, 2024, 12:45pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/view-progress-towards-a-badge/44628/8 "2024-06-08T12:45:42Z")

</div>

This topic was automatically closed after 2938 days. New replies are no longer allowed.
