# Visual forum statistics

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/visual-forum-statistics/34744
**Category:** Feature
**Tags:** completed
**Created:** [October 21, 2015, 3:49am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/visual-forum-statistics/34744 "2015-10-21T03:49:48Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![erlend\_sh](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/erlend_sh/32/119475_2.png) [@erlend\_sh](https://meta.discourse.org/u/erlend_sh)
#### Post date: [December 14, 2015, 4:16pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/visual-forum-statistics/34744/9 "2015-12-14T16:16:53Z")

</div>

I would love something fairly close to the GitHub Contributors stats:

 ![](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/3X/b/f/bfaa319957f36d0be3db4e85643ea7c1db1a8e63.png)

Imagine that with options for “Topics, posts, likes” etc., which could be shown all-at-once (with differently color-coded graphs) or individually. The simple date-range selector is also a wonderful feature.

I love checking out the GD Contributors tab, it tells stories. Look at these three for instance:

 ![](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/3X/a/d/ad5bc33260203771c94badbce2a04f32ed461f9a.png)

What happened here? Did they just happily scratch their itch and that’s all there is to it, or did we do something wrong that deterred them from continuing to contribute?

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/visual-forum-statistics/34744)._