# Watch Users Setting
**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/watch-users-setting/120716
**Category:** Feature
**Tags:** completed
**Created:** [June 18, 2019, 5:49pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watch-users-setting/120716 "2019-06-18T17:49:28Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@outofthebox](https://meta.discourse.org/u/outofthebox)
#### Post date: [June 18, 2019, 5:49pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watch-users-setting/120716/1 "2019-06-18T17:49:28Z")
Hi,
I see the following options for notifications about a member:
However, would it be possible to add a “Watching” option?
This would be especially useful for moderators who want to track potentially problematic members and their participation in a large community.
---
### Author:  [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)
#### Post date: [June 19, 2019, 8:33am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watch-users-setting/120716/2 "2019-06-19T08:33:50Z")
What would this actually do? No such feature is planned at the current time.
---
### Author:  [@outofthebox](https://meta.discourse.org/u/outofthebox)
#### Post date: [June 19, 2019, 1:22pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watch-users-setting/120716/3 "2019-06-19T13:22:33Z")
Hi Jeff, that’s a completely fair question.
Here are some potential use cases:
1. Intranet: An employee wants to watch the posts of their manager or a key influencer in their organization; a manager wants to watch the posts of a new hire as they get onboarded into the organization
2. Community: A member of the community wants to watch the posts of a speaker/influencer/leader of the community (perhaps an employee of the hosting organization)
3. Moderation: A moderator wants to watch the posts of a potentially troublesome community member
---
### Author:  [@Anatolia](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Anatolia)
#### Post date: [June 19, 2019, 1:39pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watch-users-setting/120716/4 "2019-06-19T13:39:57Z")
This seems equal to follow feature on social media. This plugin could be useful:
> [@Discourse Follow](https://meta.discourse.org/t/follow-plugin/110579):
>
> IMPORTANT WARNING: This plugin may affect whether laws that regulate social media apply to your forum. Consult legal for advice. discourse2Summary Discourse Follow allows users to follow other users, list the latest topics involving them, and receive notifications when they post.hammer_and_wrenchRepository Link [https://github.com/discourse/discourse-follow](https://github.com/discourse/discourse-follow)open_bookInstall Guide [How to install plugins in Discourse](https://meta.discourse.org/t/install-plugins-in-discourse/19157)Screenshots Followed users posts feed:
---
### Author:  [@StanD](https://meta.discourse.org/u/StanD)
#### Post date: [June 19, 2019, 6:00pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watch-users-setting/120716/5 "2019-06-19T18:00:57Z")
You can already do this if you want to use the rss feeds. For example, here is your activity feed on this site that is available for anyone to follow.
[https://meta.discourse.org/u/outofthebox/activity.rss](https://meta.discourse.org/u/outofthebox/activity.rss)
---
### Author:  [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)
#### Post date: [June 19, 2019, 9:44pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watch-users-setting/120716/6 "2019-06-19T21:44:32Z")
Couldn’t you already achieve this by subscribing to the RSS feed on that user’s page?
---
### Author:  [@outofthebox](https://meta.discourse.org/u/outofthebox)
#### Post date: [June 20, 2019, 12:21pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watch-users-setting/120716/7 "2019-06-20T12:21:29Z")
I think that will work. I think it would be a slight upgrade to keep all the activity within the Discourse ecosystem through this feature suggestion, but the RSS feed is a definite solution that works as well. Especially in an intranet environment, asking people to adopt both Discourse and an RSS reader will be a tough challenge. Thank you!
---
### Author:  [@Grayden\_Shand](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Grayden_Shand)
#### Post date: [April 28, 2020, 12:18pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watch-users-setting/120716/8 "2020-04-28T12:18:18Z")
I see a ton of value in making this a feature more widely available.
> [@codinghorror](#):
>
> Couldn’t you already achieve this by subscribing to the RSS feed on that user’s page?
While it’s possible to subscribe to a user’s RSS activity feed, it’s pretty cumbersome to ask users to use two separate apps (Discourse and an RSS reader) to interact with the community.
Secondly, on private sites, you would need to generate and include api keys for each user to add on to the rss links they want to follow. This is a pain point for staff generating the keys for each user, and it’s confusing to try to teach non-tech savvy users how to use the keys.
Compare these two sets of instructions for users:
- Click a button and you’ll get notified every time this person posts a new topic.
VS
- Reach out and request an API key, then download an RSS reader, then go to the user’s activity page, add .rss, append your api key to the link, add that link to your RSS reader. Now, check your RSS reader daily for new posts by the users you’ve added.
Clearly there’s room to make that easier.
> [@Anatolia](#):
>
> This seems equal to follow feature on social media. This plugin could be useful:
This plugin is great for this, but alas it’s only available for self-hosted or enterprise sites.
I’d love to see that plugin be included in Discourse’s official plugins so that standard and business hosted sites can use it. Keeping it as a plugin would still default to your philosophical perspective that on a Discussion platform, users shouldn’t care about who is saying something but rather what is being said. Yet, it would allow any community that DOES see value in letting users follow one another to easily add this feature to their site.
---
### Author:  [@sam](https://meta.discourse.org/u/sam)
#### Post date: [April 29, 2020, 12:06am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watch-users-setting/120716/9 "2020-04-29T00:06:20Z")
One huge question I have here is what value this would provide over having a slightly different category structure?
If you have posts that you really want everyone to be aware of you could create a category for announcements and make sure people watch or track it.
Can you expand on some real world examples of when this feature is desirable. There are also lots of concerns around the “followed” feeling bad. If every time a celebrity posts on a form the same 50 people like them and reply to them cause they have them on the crossfires it can be quite stressful for said celebrity. Also.. how does this not become a popularity contest?
I have many questions here 🙂
---
### Author:  [@outofthebox](https://meta.discourse.org/u/outofthebox)
#### Post date: [April 29, 2020, 12:23pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watch-users-setting/120716/10 "2020-04-29T12:23:23Z")
For one, it goes with behavior that people are already familiar with from other interactive platforms. That reduces the learning curve.
For another, people post in multiple Categories. If there’s someone who I want to keep an eye on (potential problem) or who I respect and want to learn from, then the ability to follow them helps me sort out the signal from the noise. For whatever reason, I am interested in that person’s posts, and this plugin allows me to follow them at that level.
Here are some use cases:
> [@Watch Users Setting](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watch-users-setting/120716/3):
>
> Hi Jeff, that’s a completely fair question. Here are some potential use cases: Intranet: An employee wants to watch the posts of their manager or a key influencer in their organization; a manager wants to watch the posts of a new hire as they get onboarded into the organization Community: A member of the community wants to watch the posts of a speaker/influencer/leader of the community (perhaps an employee of the hosting organization) Moderation: A moderator wants to watch the posts of…
---
### Author:  [@Grayden\_Shand](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Grayden_Shand)
#### Post date: [April 29, 2020, 1:06pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watch-users-setting/120716/11 "2020-04-29T13:06:08Z")
> [@sam](#):
>
> One huge question I have here is what value this would provide over having a slightly different category structure?
>
> If you have posts that you really want everyone to be aware of you could create a category for announcements and make sure people watch or track it.
Happy to give my take, I think an example will help you understand where I see the value in this feature.
Let’s say that you have a community of (amateur) writers. The purpose of the community is for these creatives to discuss their craft, but also to give each other feedback and motivation on their work. One category is called “Weekly Prompts”, in which the community staff post a weekly writing prompt. Writers can add their response to the prompt as a topic, and get feedback from their peers.
As a writer, let’s say you find another writer that you just jive with. You love reading eachother’s work, and you both leave great feedback. In fact, you want to make sure you see all of this other writer’s work. So you ask them to @ mention you when they post. However, they say they have 10 other people who also want to follow their work, and it’s a lot to ask the writer to @ mention each individual every time they post.
So, they form a group. Now, the writer @ mentions the group when they post. This works for a while, but what if I find someone else whose work I want to follow that is in a different feedback group? It results in a fractal group structure where, yes each user might have say 10 other people in their network, but it’s the SAME 10 people for each user in the group. If I want to follow someone new, I either need to add them to my group (meaning that now everyone in my group follows them) or I need to create a new group for this new circle.
I help run an e-learning platform through discourse, and this is exactly the situation we’re in. The ability to follow someone a student has connected with in our workshops is probably the most requested feature from our users.
So, to your specific point, it’s not that I want EVERYONE to be aware of an announcement, I see this feature supporting a tighter connection between individuals in a community.
> [@sam](#):
>
> There are also lots of concerns around the “followed” feeling bad. If every time a celebrity posts on a form the same 50 people like them and reply to them cause they have them on the crossfires it can be quite stressful for said celebrity. Also… how does this not become a popularity contest?
These are totally valid concerns. I certainly don’t pretend to have THE answers. However, to get around the concerns about “followed” feeling bad, maybe it’s a symmetrical connection, so I can’t follow you unless you also follow me (think facebook friends instead of twitter followers). How do we avoid it becoming a popularity contest? Well what if there was an option to set a cap on the number of connections you can have? This would drive home the point that it’s not about the quantity, but the quality of your connections. Admittedly this could cause some awkward tension if your “friend” ditches you to make room for someone else… Alternatively, you could make your “followers” list private so that no one knows who is popular and who has no followers.
Let me know if you have any more questions I might be able to help think through! Thanks Sam.
---
### Author:  [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)
#### Post date: [April 29, 2020, 2:52pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watch-users-setting/120716/12 "2020-04-29T14:52:06Z")
Why not visit the user’s profile page from time to time? All their activity is right there on the user page. There’s a very simple solution here right in front of everyone.
I honestly don’t see us ever doing this as anything other than a completely optional plugin.
---
### Author:  [@outofthebox](https://meta.discourse.org/u/outofthebox)
#### Post date: [April 29, 2020, 3:10pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watch-users-setting/120716/13 "2020-04-29T15:10:51Z")
Because people want convenience. In a business context, people don’t want to miss posts from their manager or an important direct report or a colleague that they work closely with. What I find is that people default to the channels that give them the easiest, most seamless solution. If Discourse doesn’t do it, they just use email or chat instead.
---
### Author:  [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)
#### Post date: [April 29, 2020, 3:15pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watch-users-setting/120716/14 "2020-04-29T15:15:35Z")
That’s fine by me, personally.
---
### Author:  [@Grayden\_Shand](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Grayden_Shand)
#### Post date: [April 29, 2020, 4:49pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watch-users-setting/120716/15 "2020-04-29T16:49:45Z")
> [@codinghorror](#):
>
> Why not visit the user’s profile page from time to time? All their activity is right there on the user page. There’s a very simple solution here right in front of everyone.
Thanks Jeff. By that logic, why include the option to watch a category or topic? Why not just go visit that topic from time to time to see if anyone has written anything new or responded to something you said?
The difference is between making users hunt for the content they want to see versus serving it up to them. If we know ahead of time that a user wants to stay up to date with a topic or category, we send a notification when there’s new activity for them. Similarly, if we know a head of time that a user wants to say up to date with another user, why put it on the user to go find that content? I’d appreciate your perspective on how these are different.
> [@codinghorror](#):
>
> I honestly don’t see us ever doing this as anything other than a completely optional plugin.
I agree this should be a completely optional plugin, there are a lot of communities where this feature wouldn’t make things better (e.g. I don’t think Meta would be better with a follow feature). Though, as such a commonly requested feature, I think the plugin should be available for standard and business hosted sites by being incorporated into Discourse’s list of official plugins.
---
### Author:  [@riking](https://meta.discourse.org/u/riking)
#### Post date: [April 29, 2020, 5:48pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watch-users-setting/120716/16 "2020-04-29T17:48:14Z")
Something I could see being supported is scoping the user watch to a single category or set of categories, to avoid the forum-wide creeper effect / never being allowed to turn off your public persona.
To take the writing example: automatically watch any topics / replies the user creates in any of the Story categories, but never any of the Story Discussion categories - the set of “fans” don’t need to be interrupted to see the author’s opinions on _other_ stories.
---
### Author:  [@Grayden\_Shand](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Grayden_Shand)
#### Post date: [April 29, 2020, 10:02pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watch-users-setting/120716/17 "2020-04-29T22:02:39Z")
@riking Smart!
If I may add on to that, what if this were a category setting, say **follower\_notification\_enabled** _(default false)_. Then admins can control which categories this feature is supported on.
---
### Author:  [@sam](https://meta.discourse.org/u/sam)
#### Post date: [April 30, 2020, 5:07am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watch-users-setting/120716/18 "2020-04-30T05:07:46Z")
One area I think may be interesting to experiment in is hash tagging. I think this addresses many of the concerns @codinghorror has and has been mentioned before quite a few times. One issue though is that `#` is already reserved for tags and categories so it would have to be a different symbol (or a double #) .
Tags are now per topic, there is no clean way of tagging a post. But … let’s imagine for a second that this exists.
> Tales from Sam’s desktop
>
> Here are the awesome tales from Sam’s desktop
> More of the story
>
> ##sams-desktop-adventures
Then users could watch `##sams-desktop-adventures` and be notified of all new posts with that tag.
The `##sams-desktop-adventures` would automatically become a link, clicking it would give you search results for all posts containing the hashtag.
This to me seems far more in the spirit of solving the specific issue without needing to revert to the “stalking” aspect of user following.
Not saying this is happening right now, but I think we would be far more open to having a system like this (default off) for communities that want “post tagging” vs “topic tagging” ability.
---
### Author:  [@JammyDodger](https://meta.discourse.org/u/JammyDodger)
#### Post date: [July 15, 2024, 3:35pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watch-users-setting/120716/19 "2024-07-15T15:35:10Z")
I think the core elements of this request are covered by the (now #official) [Discourse Follow](https://meta.discourse.org/t/follow-plugin/110579) plugin. 🥳
Let’s close this one off and any enhancements can be discussed in new proposals. 👍
---
### Author:  [@JammyDodger](https://meta.discourse.org/u/JammyDodger)
#### Post date: [July 15, 2024, 3:35pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watch-users-setting/120716/20 "2024-07-15T15:35:12Z")