# Watched words也适用于员工吗？

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/watched-words-also-applied-to-staff/231538>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Tags:** watched-words\
**Created:** [2022年六月30日 06:42 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watched-words-also-applied-to-staff/231538 "2022-06-30T06:42:21Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nooice](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/ee7513/32.png) [@nooice](https://meta.discourse.org/u/nooice)\
**Post date:** [2022年六月30日 06:42 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watched-words-also-applied-to-staff/231538/1 "2022-06-30T06:42:21Z")

</div>

根据这些帖子，工作人员的帖子在设计上不受监视词检查的影响

> [@Watched words triggered when editing old posts](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watched-words-triggered-when-editing-old-posts/69355/7?u=nooice):
>
> Staff are excluded from the checks, so what you’re seeing is correct. So those steps are the same as what you reported in your first post?

> [@\* wildcards in Watched Words (Censor) don't work](https://meta.discourse.org/t/wildcards-in-watched-words-censor-dont-work/77007/4?u=nooice):
>
> Yes staff are immune to this by design. So not a bug.

> [@Watched words for staff members too](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watched-words-for-staff-members-too/81523?u=nooice):
>
> Hi, Is there any way to check staff for inappropriate words during posting? I tried Watched Words option, but it works only for non-staff. As I understand, it works as designed. I would like to avoid staff members use some phrases, for instance, they need to check themselves the URL published (external must be): NOT OK: The issue has been added: https://internal.domain.com/B-123 OK: The issue has been added: https://external.domain.com/B-123 How to achieve this?

但它似乎在我的部署中不起作用，已在 2.7.13 和 2.8.2 上进行了测试，使用管理员帐户发帖

 ![20220630141927](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/4X/f/5/0/f50fda180571760fcffd9bd7100492b123230bfd.png)  
 ![20220630142332](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/4X/7/5/9/759a792b4a0f4f8844371151d79f7950e64058e4.png)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sam](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/sam/32/102149_2.png) [@sam](https://meta.discourse.org/u/sam)\
**Post date:** [2022年六月30日 08:11 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watched-words-also-applied-to-staff/231538/2 "2022-06-30T08:11:34Z")

</div>

是的，它们对其他章节都具有免疫性，但 replace 是特殊的。

将此放入 #Contribute > Feature 中，许多社区希望均匀地应用 replace，因为它被用于将某些词语转换为超链接等。

例如，尽管我是工作人员，但当我输入 [safe mode](https://meta.discourse.org/t/53504?silent=true) 时，它在这里会变成链接，这是可取的。

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nooice](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/ee7513/32.png) [@nooice](https://meta.discourse.org/u/nooice)\
**Post date:** [2022年六月30日 08:40 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watched-words-also-applied-to-staff/231538/3 "2022-06-30T08:40:02Z")

</div>

“Censor” 的工作方式与“Replace”相同吗？因为我发现管理员帖子也被审查了。有什么方法可以让员工绕过规则吗？