# Palavras monitoradas para membros da equipe tamb茅m
**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/watched-words-for-staff-members-too/81523
**Category:** Support
**Created:** [Fevereiro 26, 2018, 9:27am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watched-words-for-staff-members-too/81523 "2018-02-26T09:27:47Z")
**Posts on this page:** 6
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@Ivan\_Rapekas](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Ivan_Rapekas)
#### Post date: [Fevereiro 26, 2018, 9:27am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watched-words-for-staff-members-too/81523/1 "2018-02-26T09:27:47Z")
Hi,
Is there any way to check staff for inappropriate words during posting? I tried Watched Words option, but it works only for non-staff. As I understand, it works as designed.
I would like to avoid staff members use some phrases, for instance, they need to check themselves the URL published (external must be):
NOT OK: The issue has been added: `https://internal.domain.com/B-123`
OK: The issue has been added: `https://external.domain.com/B-123`
How to achieve this?
---
### Author:  [@sam](https://meta.discourse.org/u/sam)
#### Post date: [Fevereiro 27, 2018, 7:24am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watched-words-for-staff-members-too/81523/2 "2018-02-27T07:24:41Z")
I think you would need a custom plugin to place this kind of restriction on staff. They get a free pass with watched words.
---
### Author:  [@Ivan\_Rapekas](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Ivan_Rapekas)
#### Post date: [Fevereiro 27, 2018, 8:22am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watched-words-for-staff-members-too/81523/3 "2018-02-27T08:22:35Z")
Thank you, @sam!
The best solution I think is to work staff as normal users but with a `sudo` button to be able temporary granted as moderators or admins when they need 馃檪.
Reasons: 1) most of the time staff does the same things like normal users, 2) staff should understand what options of the forum regular users can use - sometimes staff members have the second user profile, but I don鈥檛 like this.
---
### Author:  [@pfaffman](https://meta.discourse.org/u/pfaffman)
#### Post date: [Agosto 19, 2020, 6:45pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watched-words-for-staff-members-too/81523/4 "2020-08-19T18:45:54Z")
Estou procurando uma maneira de conceder imunidade a palavras monitoradas para um grupo _sem_ torn谩-los membros da equipe.
Eu estava pensando em:
1. substituir o `self.word` por null ou espa莽os em [discourse/app/models/watched\_word.rb at main 路 discourse/discourse 路 GitHub](https://github.com/discourse/discourse/blob/master/app/models/watched_word.rb#L16-L18)
2. fazer com que `create_or_update_word` retorne imediatamente se o usu谩rio for membro do grupo ([discourse/app/models/watched\_word.rb at main 路 discourse/discourse 路 GitHub](https://github.com/discourse/discourse/blob/master/app/models/watched_word.rb#L37-L44))
Alguma dessas op莽玫es parece uma maneira razo谩vel de permitir que um grupo seja imune a palavras monitoradas?
---
### Author:  [@chrismalone](https://meta.discourse.org/u/chrismalone)
#### Post date: [Agosto 22, 2020, 3:55pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watched-words-for-staff-members-too/81523/5 "2020-08-22T15:55:59Z")
Tamb茅m poderia usar isso em uma nova comunidade que estou construindo. Com certeza ficarei de olho em uma solu莽茫o aqui.
---
### Author:  [@JammyDodger](https://meta.discourse.org/u/JammyDodger)
#### Post date: [Junho 8, 2024, 12:36pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watched-words-for-staff-members-too/81523/6 "2024-06-08T12:36:59Z")
Este t贸pico foi automaticamente fechado ap贸s 2294 dias. Novas respostas n茫o s茫o mais permitidas.