# Watching group PMs by default

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/watching-group-pms-by-default/55285>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [2017年一月6日 16:44 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watching-group-pms-by-default/55285 "2017-01-06T16:44:59Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 16

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![scombs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/scombs/32/48616_2.png) [@scombs](https://meta.discourse.org/u/scombs)\
**Post date:** [2017年三月14日 10:04 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watching-group-pms-by-default/55285/16 "2017-03-14T10:04:55Z")

</div>

I agree. No need to wait but don’t forget this feature on email notification footer so users know it’s a group PM

> [@Email Notification recipients unclear when PM is sent to multiple users](https://meta.discourse.org/t/email-notification-recipients-unclear-when-pm-is-sent-to-multiple-users/26934/34):
>
> [Adding recipients to the bottom of the mail](https://meta.discourse.org/t/email-notification-recipients-unclear-when-pm-is-sent-to-multiple-users/26934/13), combined with adding group names to group PMs, is no doubt the best solution to the topic at hand; “Email Notification recipients unclear when PM is sent to multiple users”. I think both of those UX elements ought to exist, regardless of whether or not we expand upon our mailing list parity. Personally I’m not too enthused about the “multiple duplicate reply keys” mailing list feature. I’ve always found it confusing and I’ve seen people mess it up mu…

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/watching-group-pms-by-default/55285)._