# What does it mean when my comment about a wrong translation is resolved but my correction is not accepted?

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-does-it-mean-when-my-comment-about-a-wrong-translation-is-resolved-but-my-correction-is-not-accepted/397765
**Category:** Translations
**Created:** [March 5, 2026, 6:40pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-does-it-mean-when-my-comment-about-a-wrong-translation-is-resolved-but-my-correction-is-not-accepted/397765 "2026-03-05T18:40:23Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![stephtara](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/stephtara/32/517827_2.png) [@stephtara](https://meta.discourse.org/u/stephtara)
#### Post date: [March 5, 2026, 6:40pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-does-it-mean-when-my-comment-about-a-wrong-translation-is-resolved-but-my-correction-is-not-accepted/397765/1 "2026-03-05T18:40:23Z")

</div>

I tried to correct the awful (wrong) French translation for Discourse Assign in crowdin. My comment was marked as resolved but my translation wasn’t “accepted”. What’s going on here?

> **[Crowdin](https://discourse.crowdin.com/editor/4/2299/en-fr/24?view=side-by-side#198163)**

 ![Screenshot 2026-03-05 at 19.36.59](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/4X/3/4/e/34e149661a134ad0562df03ae7c7727446a8619d.png)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Moin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/moin/32/554653_2.png) [@Moin](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Moin)
#### Post date: [March 5, 2026, 9:38pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-does-it-mean-when-my-comment-about-a-wrong-translation-is-resolved-but-my-correction-is-not-accepted/397765/2 "2026-03-05T21:38:42Z")

</div>

This happened on one (actually 2) of my comments too.

 ![Screenshot_20260305_223746_Chrome](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/4X/4/f/4/4f4aae12e4bd256cbfa3a08c4ccc02e7ac7dea34.jpeg)

I think your issue was accidentally dismissed, too. Just add a new one. There is currently some work on the process of revisiting already approved translations.

> [@Request to be Arabic translation reviewer](https://meta.discourse.org/t/request-to-be-arabic-translation-reviewer/397444/7):
>
> Proposing an improved translation is absolutely the right approach. Adding a brief note explaining why your version is preferable also helps a great deal. Tt gives reviewers the necessary context and makes the evaluation much easier. At the moment, suggestions on strings that have already been approved often don’t get revisited. This is particularly true for reviews handled by the translation agency, where approved strings are typically treated as final. To improve this, we plan to extend our …