# 邀请链接怎么了？ **URL:** \ **Category:** UX\ **Created:** [2019年二月27日 13:01 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-happened-to-the-invite-links/110232 "2019-02-27T13:01:30Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 8\ **Page:** 3
**Author:** ![codinghorror](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/codinghorror/32/110067_2.png) [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)\ **Post date:** [2019年四月23日 23:58 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-happened-to-the-invite-links/110232/43 "2019-04-23T23:58:30Z")
> [@david](#): > > I believe that the “topic level” share button should open the new share/invite modal. Only the post-level 🔗 should open the native OS share window I was getting a bit confused about this topic .. so this is the current and final solution yes @j.jaffeux ? ---
**Author:** ![j.jaffeux](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/j.jaffeux/32/60297_2.png) [@j.jaffeux](https://meta.discourse.org/u/j.jaffeux)\ **Post date:** [2019年四月24日 06:08 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-happened-to-the-invite-links/110232/44 "2019-04-24T06:08:12Z")
Yes this is it. It was a bit confusing for multiple reasons: - I made it possible to invite from mobile which wasn’t possible before - some buttons were merged (topic footer buttons) - apple decided to enable native sharing about at this time, and my method to check lack of native support was not great and lead to an action showing both native and modal on apple devices This is not ideal but I dont see a way to mix native and non native UI in one action. ---
**Author:** ![codinghorror](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/codinghorror/32/110067_2.png) [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)\ **Post date:** [2019年四月24日 06:42 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-happened-to-the-invite-links/110232/45 "2019-04-24T06:42:47Z")
I think it is fine if: - post level share opens the OS-native share, where available - post level date (upper right) opens the Discourse share, which includes invite - topic level share opens Discourse share, which includes invite ---
**Author:** ![j.jaffeux](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/j.jaffeux/32/60297_2.png) [@j.jaffeux](https://meta.discourse.org/u/j.jaffeux)\ **Post date:** [2019年四月24日 06:45 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-happened-to-the-invite-links/110232/46 "2019-04-24T06:45:59Z")
Thats the situation. Only clicking on the date in a post will show the sharing card. ---
**Author:** ![j.jaffeux](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/j.jaffeux/32/60297_2.png) [@j.jaffeux](https://meta.discourse.org/u/j.jaffeux)\ **Post date:** [2019年四月24日 08:21 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-happened-to-the-invite-links/110232/47 "2019-04-24T08:21:46Z")
> [@codinghorror](#): > > post level date (upper right) opens the Discourse share, which includes invite this one does not include invite, but “new topic” which is another kind of action we have. Kind of wonder if topic footer buttons shouldn’t be named invite, with invite being first panel, given you have an explicit share action under each post. ---
**Author:** ![codinghorror](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/codinghorror/32/110067_2.png) [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)\ **Post date:** [2019年四月24日 08:51 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-happened-to-the-invite-links/110232/48 "2019-04-24T08:51:52Z")
> [@j.jaffeux](#): > > Kind of wonder if topic footer buttons shouldn’t be named invite, with invite being first panel, given you have an explicit share action under each post. Ehhhh I dunno, one of the reason we moved that functionality is that it was so rarely used. Elevating it back to first billing on the button doesn’t seem like a wise choice to me; sharing is (far) more common than inviting. ---
**Author:** ![j.jaffeux](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/j.jaffeux/32/60297_2.png) [@j.jaffeux](https://meta.discourse.org/u/j.jaffeux)\ **Post date:** [2019年四月24日 08:52 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-happened-to-the-invite-links/110232/49 "2019-04-24T08:52:53Z")
Yes agreed, but this way we have both easily accessible without having two buttons. Fine leaving as it is, will see if people ask “where is the invite button” often. probably not. ---
**Author:** ![j.jaffeux](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/j.jaffeux/32/60297_2.png) [@j.jaffeux](https://meta.discourse.org/u/j.jaffeux)\ **Post date:** [2019年四月24日 16:00 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-happened-to-the-invite-links/110232/50 "2019-04-24T16:00:06Z")
This topic was automatically closed after 24 hours. New replies are no longer allowed. [上一頁](https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-happened-to-the-invite-links/110232.md?page=2)