# 如果徽章可以可选地同步组成员资格会怎样？

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-if-badges-could-optionally-synchronize-group-membership/92232>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Tags:** badges, groups, completed\
**Created:** [2018 年7 月 13 日 04:58 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-if-badges-could-optionally-synchronize-group-membership/92232 "2018-07-13T04:58:13Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

作者： ![codinghorror](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/codinghorror/32/110067_2.png) [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)\
发布日期： [2018 年7 月 13 日 05:46 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-if-badges-could-optionally-synchronize-group-membership/92232/3 "2018-07-13T05:46:52Z")

</div>

I feel like this has massive overlap with trust levels; it’s building a parallel system for.. well, I’m not sure why. In the quote you posted, that is _literally_ the reason we have trust levels in the first place. So tying content unlock to

- trust level 1 (a tiny bit of reading)
- trust level 2 (a fair bit more reading)

should cover this scenario.

There are many many things I’d rather we work on than this.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-if-badges-could-optionally-synchronize-group-membership/92232)._