# 如果徽章可以可选地同步组成员资格会怎样？

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-if-badges-could-optionally-synchronize-group-membership/92232>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Tags:** badges, groups, completed\
**Created:** [2018年七月13日 04:58 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-if-badges-could-optionally-synchronize-group-membership/92232 "2018-07-13T04:58:13Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sam](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/sam/32/102149_2.png) [@sam](https://meta.discourse.org/u/sam)\
**Post date:** [2018年七月13日 05:55 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-if-badges-could-optionally-synchronize-group-membership/92232/4 "2018-07-13T05:55:25Z")

</div>

> [@codinghorror](#):
>
> There are many many things I’d rather we work on than this.

I definitely do not see this as an urgent change, we lock out badge sql anyway out-of-the-box. However I do see this as something I would like to get to eventually.

It is a simple generalization of the “automatic group” system that now exists.

This does simplify workflows as well, you can grant a badge to a user and then you do not need to go to the group and also grant membership. For example: “Customer champion” badge that grants access to “champions” group and “champion discussion” category on the site. Having the bridge also means you only need to remove membership in 1 spot to have both badge and group change.

Nothing urgent to change here, its just that there are tons of parallels between groups and badges so having a bridge helps get automatic feature parity on both sides.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-if-badges-could-optionally-synchronize-group-membership/92232)._